Action! - performance test results

Gameplay recording , desktop and web videos recording, music recording...
User avatar
Ghost
Mirillis Team
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:32 pm
PC Specification: dozens...

Action! - performance test results

Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:25 pm

First Action! performance test results are available:
http://mirillis.com/en/products/action_ ... sktop.html

This test includes performance results for 1920x1080 60fps desktop recording with very basic user actions (moving Windows explorer window, minimize, resize etc.).
Mirillis Team Member

Follow us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/MirillisTeam
Find us on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/Mirillis
Mirillis News Feed:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/mirillisfeed

User avatar
P.J
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:25 pm
PC Specification: i5-4460, 16GB RAM, GTX 960, Win10 x64

Re: Action! - performance test results

Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:44 am

:idea: True 60fps, Low CPU usage, 72Mbps

What format does Action! save in that result?

User avatar
vivan
Expert User
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:56 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
PC Specification: Acer Aspire TimelineX 3830TG

Re: Action! - performance test results

Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:44 am

P.J wrote:What format does Action! save in that result?
http://mirillis.com/en/products/action_faq.html
Action! records videos in its own format called FIC. This is highly optimized codec for games and desktop recordings.
Video Codec FICV (Fast Intra Compression Video - Mirillis codec)
Desktop (Intel i7-970, ATI 5870, Windows 7 x64)
Acer Aspire TimelineX 3830TG (Intel i5-2410M, nVidia GT540M, Windows 7 x64)
PS Vita, Nokia N8

User avatar
Ghost
Mirillis Team
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:32 pm
PC Specification: dozens...

Re: Action! - performance test results

Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:30 pm

New test is available:
http://mirillis.com/en/products/action_ ... tml#test-2

1920x1080 desktop recording with windowed Full HD AVCHD 60i clip playback.
Playback with Splash PRO, hardware acceleration enabled, default Splash window size.
Mirillis Team Member

Follow us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/MirillisTeam
Find us on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/Mirillis
Mirillis News Feed:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/mirillisfeed

applejack
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:00 am
PC Specification: Q6600, 8800GT, Win7 32bit

Re: Action! - performance test results

Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:24 pm

very promising results :)

waiting for some directx games record performance test results...

User avatar
P.J
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:25 pm
PC Specification: i5-4460, 16GB RAM, GTX 960, Win10 x64

Re: Action! - performance test results

Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:17 am

Action :!:

I had to use my camcorder one time but Action! is the way!
60FPS + Low HDD Usage = :shock:

Vlad
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:51 pm
PC Specification: i5 2500k, Gtx570, Win7 x64 pro sp1

Re: Action! - performance test results

Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:31 pm

Yeah, results are amazing, same as Action!... Cant wait to get it... :|

locutus
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:18 pm
PC Specification: Intel i5, GeForce GTX590, Win7 Pro 64bit

Re: Action! - performance test results

Mon May 20, 2013 3:05 pm

Could you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?

AlanDavison
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 4:54 pm
PC Specification: Intel i5, NVIDIA GTX580, Windows 7

Re: Action! - performance test results

Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:38 pm

Well, a drive with a 100MB/s write speed can certainly handle Action! recording at 2560x1440 at 60fps.

As shown here.

User avatar
Montago
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:57 pm
PC Specification: Core i7 3770K, Asus 7970@1Ghz, 16GB DDR3

Re: Action! - performance test results

Sat Aug 03, 2013 4:43 pm

maybe you should include a quality benchmark too *cough* ...

1920x1080p60 recording of games using QuickSync doesn't look very good - p30 looks pretty good though :)

Next
Return to Action!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests