User avatar
radi
Mirillis Team
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:31 pm
PC Specification: i7-3610QM, 8GB RAM, GTX 660M

Re: Action! - performance test results

Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:31 pm

Montago wrote:maybe you should include a quality benchmark too *cough* ...

1920x1080p60 recording of games using QuickSync doesn't look very good - p30 looks pretty good though :)
It hasn't been update for a while but we will surely do such a benchmark in future ;)
Follow us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/MirillisTeam
Find us on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/Mirillis

StrifeCE
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:58 pm
PC Specification: Windows 7 Home Prem, (64)

Re: Action! - performance test results

Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:54 pm

what about vs Dxtory.

Its a highly used recording program i've found with a lot more usability for screen recordings
i would like to see those results

DJRiful
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:38 am
PC Specification: 3930K, GTX TITAN, Windows 8 Pro 64bit

Re: Action! - performance test results

Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:37 am

StrifeCE wrote:what about vs Dxtory.

Its a highly used recording program i've found with a lot more usability for screen recordings
i would like to see those results
Dxtory is nice but requires faster hardwares to process the data onto the disk, Action! is light and it is really good at it already.

The only time I will use Dxtory is to record 120fps footages.

bgpitts
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:30 am
PC Specification: windows 7
Location: Herminie
Contact: Website

Re: Action! - performance test results

Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:36 am

Could you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?

nietva
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:30 pm
PC Specification: i7 4770, gtx titan , 16 go ram, w7 pro

Re: Action! - performance test results

Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:52 pm


universaldirect333
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:28 pm
PC Specification: windows 7
Location: Oakwood Village,
Contact: Website

Re: Action! - performance test results

Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:50 pm

ould you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?

MrT
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:11 am
PC Specification: i7 920, Palit GTX275, Windows 7 x64

Re: Action! - performance test results

Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:58 pm

universaldirect333 wrote:ould you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?
PlayClaw now is not in best condition, if we are talking about AMD APP. AMD APP is still under heavy developement. I don't know about QS. Still, the smoothness of mjpeg and "no compression" is superb, none has overwhelmed it yet I think.

User avatar
MrTra1tor
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:52 am
PC Specification: i7-4790k, R9 Fury X, Win10 64bit
Location: Sweden

Re: Action! - performance test results

Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:48 pm

Could you do a comparison using the MP4 AMD app? And maybe it's a good idea to compare Nvidia's Shadowplay or AMD's DVR aswell (on different teststations obviously)

I tried the AMD DVR last week and it's pretty close to what you get from Action!, though performance wise, I did drop a few frames and I was unabled to render it in Adobe Premiere and Action!'s direct upload didn't work for non-Action! videos, so it turned out really laggy on youtube

MrT
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:11 am
PC Specification: i7 920, Palit GTX275, Windows 7 x64

Re: Action! - performance test results

Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:47 pm

Raptr AMD DVR is working freakingly bad, I can say it's not working at all. They need to make Raptr more stable, more compatible.

the9quad
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:04 am
PC Specification: i7 4930k, 3 X 290x's, Windows 10 64 Bit

Re: Action! - performance test results

Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:56 am

http://www.twitch.tv/the9quad/b/559540249

There ya go playing BF4 at 1440p on ultra while streaming at 1080p/30fps, Mirillis smokes everything else. Check that framerate out.

Return to “Action!”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests