Page 1 of 3
Action! - performance test results
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:25 pm
by Ghost
First Action! performance test results are available:
http://mirillis.com/en/products/action_ ... sktop.html
This test includes performance results for 1920x1080 60fps desktop recording with very basic user actions (moving Windows explorer window, minimize, resize etc.).
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:44 am
by P.J
True 60fps, Low CPU usage, 72Mbps
What format does Action! save in that result?
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:44 am
by vivan
P.J wrote:What format does Action! save in that result?
http://mirillis.com/en/products/action_faq.html
Action! records videos in its own format called FIC. This is highly optimized codec for games and desktop recordings.
Video Codec FICV (Fast Intra Compression Video - Mirillis codec)
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:30 pm
by Ghost
New test is available:
http://mirillis.com/en/products/action_ ... tml#test-2
1920x1080 desktop recording with windowed Full HD AVCHD 60i clip playback.
Playback with Splash PRO, hardware acceleration enabled, default Splash window size.
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:24 pm
by applejack
very promising results
waiting for some directx games record performance test results...
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:17 am
by P.J
Action
I had to use my camcorder one time but Action! is the way!
60FPS + Low HDD Usage =
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:31 pm
by Vlad
Yeah, results are amazing, same as Action!... Cant wait to get it...
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 3:05 pm
by locutus
Could you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:38 pm
by AlanDavison
Well, a drive with a 100MB/s write speed can certainly handle Action! recording at 2560x1440 at 60fps.
As shown
here.
Re: Action! - performance test results
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 4:43 pm
by Montago
maybe you should include a quality benchmark too *cough* ...
1920x1080p60 recording of games using QuickSync doesn't look very good - p30 looks pretty good though