Page 2 of 3

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:31 pm
by radi
Montago wrote:maybe you should include a quality benchmark too *cough* ...

1920x1080p60 recording of games using QuickSync doesn't look very good - p30 looks pretty good though :)
It hasn't been update for a while but we will surely do such a benchmark in future ;)

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:54 pm
by StrifeCE
what about vs Dxtory.

Its a highly used recording program i've found with a lot more usability for screen recordings
i would like to see those results

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:37 am
by DJRiful
StrifeCE wrote:what about vs Dxtory.

Its a highly used recording program i've found with a lot more usability for screen recordings
i would like to see those results
Dxtory is nice but requires faster hardwares to process the data onto the disk, Action! is light and it is really good at it already.

The only time I will use Dxtory is to record 120fps footages.

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:36 am
by bgpitts
Could you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:52 pm
by nietva

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:50 pm
by universaldirect333
ould you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:58 pm
by MrT
universaldirect333 wrote:ould you guys also add PlayClaw in this test?
PlayClaw now is not in best condition, if we are talking about AMD APP. AMD APP is still under heavy developement. I don't know about QS. Still, the smoothness of mjpeg and "no compression" is superb, none has overwhelmed it yet I think.

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:48 pm
by MrTra1tor
Could you do a comparison using the MP4 AMD app? And maybe it's a good idea to compare Nvidia's Shadowplay or AMD's DVR aswell (on different teststations obviously)

I tried the AMD DVR last week and it's pretty close to what you get from Action!, though performance wise, I did drop a few frames and I was unabled to render it in Adobe Premiere and Action!'s direct upload didn't work for non-Action! videos, so it turned out really laggy on youtube

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:47 pm
by MrT
Raptr AMD DVR is working freakingly bad, I can say it's not working at all. They need to make Raptr more stable, more compatible.

Re: Action! - performance test results

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:56 am
by the9quad
http://www.twitch.tv/the9quad/b/559540249

There ya go playing BF4 at 1440p on ultra while streaming at 1080p/30fps, Mirillis smokes everything else. Check that framerate out.