Hi everyone,
I've read numerous posts concerning the fact that recording with Intel Quick Sync only leads to a minor decrease in performance. I find this really awesome, because a dedicated capture card, such as the Live Gamer HD, is useless to me due to the resolution of my monitor (2560x1600).
However, I do experience a great drop in FPS; in Guild Wars 2 my FPS drops from 98 to 57 FPS. Guild Wars 2 is a very CPU bound game, so I also ran a test using Crysis 2 (GPU heavy game) and again my FPS drops significantly from 113 to 73 FPS while recording. I'm recording at 1080p 30fps.
I have tested recording to a 8GB ramdisk instead of a SSD, but the performance decrease remains identical. Also, the performance when recording to AVI in comparisson to IQS is identical.
I'm sure the settings I have used are correct. The two clips below show the actual ingame drop in FPS while recording; the first clip shows Intel Quick Sync was selected.
http://youtu.be/Zn67jk2Nj5g
http://youtu.be/86VfGlQVgR8
My specs are:
Intel i7 3770k at 5.2Ghz (phase change cooling)
16 GB ram at 2400Mhz
Intel HD 4000 running at 1700Mhz.
MSI GTX 680 Lightning
Asus Maximus Gene V
All my drivers are up to date as well, including the HD 4000 drivers. All files are recorded on a Samsung 840 pro SSD.
Choosing AVI over IQS only yields larger file sizes, the actual ingame performance (i.e. FPS drop) for AVI and IQS are identical. I expected using IQS instead of AVI would yield better ingame performance. Is my assumption incorrect? Is the FPS drop that occurs during recording with Intel Quick Sync (40% drop in FPS) the way it should be, or should the performance be better than the performance I'm getting now?