User avatar
MrTra1tor
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:52 am
PC Specification: i7-4790k, R9 Fury X, Win10 64bit
Location: Sweden

Which one is better? Quick Sync or AMD App?

Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:03 pm

I just got an i7-4790k, and when I started Action! I noticed that I had Intel Quick Sync enabled instead of AMD App.

Does this mean that Action! records using the GPU in the CPU, or does it use the CPU to record?

And which one is better? My GPU is a Fury X, so nothing low end exactly.

Edit: So apparently 66% of all Quick Sync videos failed to render, so I was left with unusable files. AMD APP it is then!

User avatar
Cauptain
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:44 am
PC Specification: Core I5@4Ghz, 16GB, ATI R290, WIN7X64
Location: Brazil
Contact: ICQ

Re: Which one is better? Quick Sync or AMD App?

Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:57 am

AMD APP of course. Minus CPU resources and more flexible MP4 parameters (VFR fps and bitrate)



Claudio

Return to “Action! Screen and Game Recorder”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests